Here are examples of small claims court judgments, where consumers asserted their legal warranty rights. This tool can be useful to you in your negotiations with a merchant. For example, it could help you determine a reasonable durability period for your item or estimate the amount of compensation for damages to which you may be entitled. 

Cautionary note

These judgment summaries are presented for reference purposes only. An application that was settled in favour of a consumer in one situation may not necessarily result in the same ruling for another consumer. 

Several factors can influence a judge's decision regarding a reasonable durability period for an item. These include the price paid, contract clause provisions, the conditions under which the  item is used, etc. Remember that each case is different, and every decision is rendered on the basis of the evidence brought before the court.  

Exemples of judgments

Above-ground swimming pool collapsing after one season of use

Claim allowed in part

Summary

Purchase price: not specified

Claim for $7,200

  • $5,300 for the replacement of the swimming pool;
  • $1,200 $ for payments on the capital of the loan;
  • reimbursement of expert fees.

Amount awarded

$5,525

  • $5,300 for the replacement of the swimming pool;
  • $225 in reimbursement of expert fees.

Full judgment (in French only)

Perry c. Plomberie Montcalm inc. (Piscines Ste-Julienne)

October 2017

Above-ground swimming pool was not installed in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions and is inconsistent with the contract of sale

Claim allowed in part

Summary

Purchase price: $10,500

Claim for $6,934

  • Including $422.63 for lawyers’ fees;
  • $15.32 for the cost of parts.

Amount awarded

$1,515.32

  • $500 for the non-compliant walls;
  • $1,000 corrective work;
  • $15.32 for the costs of parts.

Full judgment (in French only)

Blanchette c. Piscitrium inc.

July 2017

Cover of above-ground swimming pool ripped and steel panels of pool rusted after 6 years of use

Claim allowed in part

Summary

Purchase price: $3,902.09

Claim for $2,751.57

  • $1,830.85 for the estimated cost of the work required;
  • $120.72 in fees for technician’s visit;
  • $800 for damage caused to landscaping and patio.

Amount awarded

$1,874.87

  • $209 and $326.70, representing 55% of price of cover and steel panels;
  • $59.99 for skimmer;
  • $139.00 for hardware;
  • $790 for labour;
  • $120.72 for inspection fees.

Full judgment (in French only)

Joly c. Magasin Trévi inc.

June 2017

Above-ground swimming pool collapsing in certain places at the end of the 1st summer of use

Claim dismissed

Summary

Purchase price: $6,143.11

Claim for $4,618.99

  • $1,667.14 to redo the installation work;
  • $451.85 for materials;
  • $2,500 for loss of enjoyment of the swimming pool during part of the summer.

Amount awarded

$0

Full judgment (in French only)

Moniz c. Magasin Trévi inc. (Trévi)

March 2017

Spa shell cracked after approximately 3 years of use

Claim allowed in part

Summary

Purchase price: $6,900

Claim for $7,900

  • $6,900 for the reimbursement of the purchase price;
  • $1,000 in damages.

Amount awarded

$4,645

  • $3,945, representing 4/7th of the purchase price;
  • $700 for inconvenience suffered.

Full judgment (in French only)

Girouard c. IPG Canada

November 2016

Various problems affecting spa resulting in at least 9 breakdowns in 3 years of use

Claim allowed in part

Summary

Purchase price: $12,647.06, including tax

Claim for $14,000

Reimbursement of purchase price before tax, plus $3,000 in damages

Amount awarded

$13,539.16

  • $10,539 for partial (5/6) reimbursement of purchase price;
  • $2,000 for inconvenience suffered;
  • $1,000 in punitive damages.

Full judgment (in French only)

Bergeron c. Club piscine Joliette inc.

October 2016

Spa fountains not working upon installation

Claim allowed

Summary

Purchase price: not specified

Claim for $321.91

Cost of estimate and repairs

Amount awarded

$321.91

Full judgment (in French only)

Funkel c. Lemay

September 2016

"In clear" bromine based water sanitization system of swim spa did not work properly

Claim allowed in part

Summary

Purchase price: $27,000, plus tax

Claim for $4,736.33

  • $1,725 for cost of "in clear" system;
  • $689.88 to replace cover;
  • $321.45 for products purchased;
  • $2,000 for loss of enjoyment of the spa.

Amount awarded

$3,414.88

  • Reimbursement of cost of “in clear” system and replacement of cover;
  • $1,000 for inconvenience suffered.

Full judgment (in French only)

Vachon c. Piscines Pro et patios NV inc.

June 2016

Above-ground swimming pool leaking, lock of cover broke, and fold formed in sheet metal wall 3 years after installation

Claim dismissed

Summary

Purchase price: $7,530.98

Claim for $4,880

Amount awarded

$0

Full judgment (in French only)

Desjardins c. Piscines St-Louis inc.

June 2016

Paint of in-ground swimming pool chipping and lights no longer working after one year

Claim allowed

Summary

Purchase price: $24,024

Claim for $5,432.57

Paint work and repairs

Amount awarded

$5,432.57

Full judgment (in French only)

Ramoutar c. Paquin

June 2016

Continuing your search

You can also consult other court decisions concerning legal warranties using the search engine available free of charge on the SOQUIJ website (in French only).

Last update : October 12, 2023

Was the information on this page useful to you?

Didn’t find the answers to your questions?

If you have a question for the Office or would like to file a complaint, please call us or use our information request form.

Do you have a comment on the content of this page?

You can contact the webmaster to in the content of this page.

The information contained on this page is presented in simple terms to make it easier to understand. It does not replace the texts of the laws and regulations.